Cagle v. Philips North America, LLC et al
| DONALD CAGLE |
| Philips North America, LLC and Philips RS North America LLC |
| 2:2022cv01722 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Greg Gerard Guidry |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Receipt of Transfer Case to the Western District of Pennsylvania (my) |
Filing 5
Order of MDL Transfer to District of Western Pennsylvania. MDL case number is 3014. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Transmittal Letter)(mm)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 3014. (mm) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Philips North America, LLC, Philips RS North America LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mm) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Greg Gerard Guidry and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9396956) filed by Donald Cagle. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) Attorney John D. Sileo added to party Donald Cagle(pty:pla).(Sileo, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
