Gates et al v. Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft et al
| Nia Gates and Imani Pittman |
| Volkswagen AG, Autoliv ASP Inc, Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, Autoliv, Inc., Volkswagen Group of America, Chattanooga Operations LLC and Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft |
| 2:2022cv01727 |
| June 10, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Susie Morgan |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING #8 Motion to Enroll as Counsel of Record. IT IS ORDERED that Ashley DeMouy, of the firm of Hebbler & Giordano, L.L.C., is hereby enrolled as additional counsel of record on behalf of Progressive in this matter. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 7/1/2022. (pp)
|
|
Filing 8
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Enroll Ashley DeMouy as Counsel of Record by Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Giordano, Charles) Modified text on 7/1/2022 (pp).
|
|
Filing 7
Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Autoliv ASP Inc identifying Corporate Parent Autoliv, Inc. for Autoliv ASP Inc (Dysart, Daniel)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice of Compliance by Autoliv ASP Inc re #3 Directive of the Clerk. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Returns of Service)(Dysart, Daniel) Modified on 6/21/2022 (ko).
|
|
Filing 5
Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent The Progressive Corporation, Corporate Parent Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Progressive Direct Holdings, Inc. for Progressive Paloverde Insurance Company (Escudier, Michael)
|
|
Filing 4
TEXT ORDER (No PDF Document Attached) Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 7.1, nongovernmental corporate parties must file a disclosure statement with their first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. IT IS ORDERED that any nongovernmental corporate parties in this matter file the required disclosure statement within seven (7) days of this order. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan.(bwn)
|
|
Filing 3
Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal.(pp)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, case number 2021-05299 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9397356) filed by Autoliv ASP Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 (pt 1 of 4) - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit 1 (pt 2 of 4) - State Court Record, #3 Exhibit 1 (pt 3 of 4) - State Court Record, #4 Exhibit 1 (pt 4 of 4) - State Court Record, #5 Exhibit 2 - Karen Fontana Young Email, #6 Exhibit 3 - Progressive Paloverde Consent to Removal, #7 Exhibit 4 - Autoliv Exceptions to Plaintiffs' Petition for Damages, #8 Exhibit 5 - Plaintiffs' Amended Petition, #9 Exhibit 6 - Judgment on Autoliv Exceptions, #10 Exhibit 7 - Plaintiffs' Second Amended Petition, #11 Exhibit 8 - Autoliv Re-Urged Dilatory Exception of Vagueness, #12 Exhibit 9 - Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Third Supplemental Petition, #13 Exhibit 10 - Plaintiffs' Third Amended Petition, #14 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Danielle C. Teutonico added to party Autoliv ASP Inc(pty:dft).(Teutonico, Danielle)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
