Damon J. Baldone, LLC v. Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company et al
| Damon J. Baldone, LLC |
| Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, Hilltop Specialty Insurance Company and Underwriters at Lloyd's London |
| 2:2022cv01903 |
| June 23, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Dana Douglas |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Hilltop Specialty Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Underwriters at Lloyd's London. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(ko) |
| Filing 3 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Damon J. Baldone, LLC (Vosbein, Cate) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Hilltop Specialty Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance Company, Starr Surplus Lines Insurance Company, Underwriters at Lloyd's London (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9412804) filed by Damon J. Baldone, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Starr Surplus, #3 Summons Lexington, #4 Summons Hilltop, #5 Summons Lloyds)Attorney Cate Biggs Vosbein added to party Damon J. Baldone, LLC(pty:pla).(Vosbein, Cate) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
