Miller v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Alton W. Miller |
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, State Farm Fire & Casualty Company and Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company |
2:2022cv01990 |
June 29, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Dana Douglas |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 NOTICE of Hearing. Scheduling Conference set for 8/31/2022 11:00 AM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk. (clc) |
Filing 12 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company for Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company (Mathews, Kellen) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to #7 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand Defendant's Answer, Defenses, and Request for Jury Trial by Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company.Attorney Kellen James Mathews added to party Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Mathews, Kellen) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting plaintiff's unopposed #8 motion to dismiss his claims against defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED, and plaintiff's claims against State Farm are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, each party to bear its own costs and attorney fees. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 7/14/2022. (clc) |
Filing 9 Notice of Compliance by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Attachment 1)(Mathews, Kellen) Modified text on 7/14/2022 (am). |
Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Dismiss Party State Farm by Alton W. Miller. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Lape, Willard) Modified text on 7/14/2022 (am). |
Filing 7 FIRST SUPPLEMENTAL AND AMENDED COMPLAINT against State Farm Fire & Casualty Company, Dover Bay Specialty Insurance Company filed by Alton W. Miller.(Lape, Willard) Modified text on 7/14/2022 (am). |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responsive Pleadings, as stated herein. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 07/07/2022. (am) |
Filing 5 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #4 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal. Filing attorney incorrectly changed 'N' to 'Y' at the question 'Is this motion to be decided by the Magistrate Judge Y/N?'. This motion will be decided by the district judge. Clerk took corrective action. (cwa) |
Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Notice of Removal, by State Farm Fire & Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(LeDuff, Taylor) Modified text on 7/6/2022 (cwa). Modified text/removed referral on 7/7/2022 (cwa). |
Filing 3 Directive of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. By the Clerk.(am) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Barry W Ashe and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (ess) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 22nd Judicial District Court/St. Tammany, case number 2022-12045H (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9422727) filed by State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Kellen James Mathews added to party State Farm Fire and Casualty Company(pty:dft).(Mathews, Kellen) Modified text on 6/30/2022 (am). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.