Banihani v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Mostafa Banihani |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2022cv02096 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Michael North |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services served on 7/22/2022, answer due 9/20/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Affidavit)(Gahagan, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Summons Attorney General, #2 Summons United States Attorney's Office)(js) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Mandamus against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9436679) filed by Mostafa Banihani. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney Michael Wayne Gahagan added to party Mostafa Banihani(pty:pla).(Gahagan, Michael) Modified text on 7/11/2022 (js). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
