Hardy v. Melle
| Thaddeus Hardy |
| Michel Melle and Michel F Melle |
| 2:2022cv02160 |
| July 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Dana Douglas |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint as further set forth in document. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/17/2022. (lw)
|
| Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint by Michel F Melle. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Ex Parte Order, #2 Notice of Submission Proof of Service)Attorney Stephen Nathaniel Chesnut added to party Michel F Melle(pty:dft).(Chesnut, Stephen) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Michel F Melle served on 7/24/2022, answer due 8/15/2022. (Bizer, Andrew) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Michel F Melle. (js) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (go) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michel Melle (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9444683) filed by Thaddeus Hardy. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Andrew David Bizer added to party Thaddeus Hardy(pty:pla).(Bizer, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
