Alexander v. Louisiana State et al
Plaintiff: Christopher M Alexander
Defendant: Louisiana State
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Case Number: 2:2022cv02256
Filed: July 19, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Janis van Meerveld
Referring Judge: Wendy B Vitter
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The Court, having considered the Petition Under 28 U.S.C. 2254 for Writ of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody, the record, the applicable law, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition of Christopher Alexander for the issuance of a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court DENIES a certificate of appealability. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 9/22/22.(cg)
August 25, 2022 Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: IT IS RECOMMENDED that the #4 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Christopher M. Alexander be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Objections to R&R due by 9/8/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 8/25/2022.(ajn)
August 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 8/17/2022. (ajn)
August 15, 2022 Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher M Alexander. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. (Attachments: #1 Original Deficient Filing)(ss)
August 15, 2022 Filing 4 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Christopher M Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Original Deficient Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss)
July 22, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254), #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 8/12/2022. (ss)
July 19, 2022 Filing 2 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Christopher M Alexander. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. (ss)
July 19, 2022 Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Christopher M Alexander. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alexander v. Louisiana State et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher M Alexander
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louisiana State
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Louisiana
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?