ELK12 Properties, LLC v. Axis Surplus Insurance Company et al
| ELK12 Properties, LLC |
| Axis Surplus Insurance Company and AMWINS Access Insurance Services, LLC |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv02260 |
| July 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl Barbier |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(lag)
|
|
Filing 11
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - INTERIM PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 09/14/22.(my)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER - On August 26, 2022 the en banc court adopted Hurricane Ida CMO #1, creating a court supervised Streamlined Settlement Program ("SSP"). With respect to the currently pending Hurricane Ida cases that were previously filed, the CMO provides that the parties may opt-in to the SSP by agreement and with consent of the presiding District Judge. (Section 3-F). This Order is intended to facilitate such action, without the need for the parties in every case to sign and file opt-in forms. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that with respect to each of the above listed cases pending in Section "J", the parties will be presumed to agree to opt-in to the SSP, subject to the CMO #1, unless a party objects to participating in the SSP. Any such objection must be filed not later than fourteen (14) days from the date of this order, otherwise the Court will assume that all parties have agreed to opt-in. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties also acknowledge that, by opting into the SSP, the case will be stayed pursuant to the terms of CMO #1, and the stay will only be lifted pursuant to the terms contained therein. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 9/6/22.(cg)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Opportunity to Opt In to the In Re Hurricane Ida Streamlined Settlement Program. (lag) |
|
Filing 8
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 08/26/22.(lag)
|
| Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 Notice of Compliance. Filing attorney incorrectly linked document to document 3. Clerk properly linked document to document 1. (cs) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1447(b) by Axis Surplus Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings)(Barton, Emma) Modified text/link on 8/16/2022 (cs). |
| Filing 5 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Axis Surplus Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Axis Capital Holdings, Ltd. for Axis Surplus Insurance Company (Barton, Emma) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Axis Surplus Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Policy)(Barton, Emma) |
| Filing 3 DIRECTIVES Pursuant to 28:1447(b) by Clerk.(cg) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 32nd Judicial District Court of Terrebonne Parish, case number 193829 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9457902) filed by Axis Surplus Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Emma Madison Barton added to party Axis Surplus Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Barton, Emma) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
