Naquin v. Medtronic, Inc.
Matthew Naquin |
Medtronic, Inc. |
2:2022cv02629 |
August 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Barry W Ashe |
Carl Barbier |
Donna Phillips Currault |
Michael North |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 21 ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that Naquins #20 motion to dismiss is GRANTED, and Naquin's claims against Medtronic, Inc. are dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 9/13/2022. (cwa) |
Filing 20 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice by Matthew Naquin. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Miller-Radovic, Lizette) |
Filing 19 ORDER DENYING #12 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 9/9/2022. (pp) |
Filing 18 ORDER & REASONS: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Matthew Naquin's #11 motion to recuse is DENIED. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 9/9/2022. (pp) |
Filing 17 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Medtronic, Inc. re #12 MOTION to Remand to State Court . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1)(Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 16 RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Medtronic, Inc. re #11 MOTION to Recuse Judge Barry Ashe . (Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 15 ORDER re #14 Request/Statement of Oral Argument: The Court declines to schedule oral argument at this time. If the Court later finds that oral argument would be helpful, counsel will be notified. Signed by Judge Barry W Ashe on 08/24/2022.(am) |
Filing 14 Request/Statement of Oral Argument by Medtronic, Inc. regarding #13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim . (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Medtronic, Inc.. Motion(s) will be submitted on 10/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Notice of Submission)(Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Matthew Naquin. Motion(s) will be submitted on 9/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Notice of Submission)(Miller-Radovic, Lizette) Modified text on 8/22/2022 (am). |
Filing 11 MOTION to Recuse Judge Barry Ashe by Matthew Naquin. Motion(s) will be submitted on 9/8/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Notice of Submission)(Miller-Radovic, Lizette) Modified text on 8/22/2022 (am). |
Filing 10 Request/Statement of Oral Argument by Medtronic, Inc. regarding #9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 9 DEFICIENT: MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Medtronic, Inc. Motion(s) will be submitted on 10/6/2022. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit c, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Notice of Submission)(Boyer, Nicole) Modified text on 8/19/2022 (mm). |
Filing 8 ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned matter beTRANSFERRED to Section "M"(5) for further proceedings. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 8/16/2022.(NEF: Sections J, M, 2 & 5)(pp) |
Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Notice of Removal, Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of Civil Cover Sheet. The pdf should not have the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. (cs) |
Filing 6 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Medtronic, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Medtronic plc for Medtronic, Inc. (Boyer, Nicole) Modified text on 8/12/2022 (cs). |
Filing 5 Notice of Related Case(s) by Medtronic, Inc. of related case(s) 2:20-cv-02401-BWA-MBN. (Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Medtronic, Inc. (Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 3 Notice of Compliance by Medtronic, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal,. (Boyer, Nicole) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (mb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Terrebonne Parish, case number 193371 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9492296) filed by Medtronic, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Nicole M. Boyer added to party Medtronic, Inc.(pty:dft).(Boyer, Nicole) (Attachment 5 replaced on 8/12/2022) (cs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Naquin v. Medtronic, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Matthew Naquin | |
Represented By: | Lizette Miller-Radovic |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Nicole M. Boyer |
Represented By: | Kelly Cambre Bogart |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.