Jenkins v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company et al
Fredrell Jenkins |
Indian Harbor Insurance Company and Phillip Cameron Rose |
2:2022cv02670 |
August 15, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Jay C Zainey |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 6 NOTICE: Scheduling Conference set for 9/28/2022 11:00 AM before case manager by telephone. By Clerk. (blg) |
Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint (Petition for Damages) by Phillip Cameron Rose.(Bernard, David) |
Filing 4 Notice of Compliance List of Parties and Pleadings per 28 USC 1447(b) by Phillip Cameron Rose re #3 Order. (Bernard, David) |
Filing 3 DIRECTIVE Pursuant to 28-1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal by Clerk.(ajn) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (mb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, case number 2022-00673 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9497974) filed by Phillip Cameron Rose, Indian Harbor Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit)Attorney David C. Bernard added to party Indian Harbor Insurance Company(pty:dft), Attorney David C. Bernard added to party Phillip Cameron Rose(pty:dft).(Bernard, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.