Cheramie et al v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Norris Cheramie, Jr, Andrea Falgout-Cheramie and Norris Cheramie, Jr. |
Wright National Flood Insurance Company |
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
2:2022cv02919 |
August 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Wendy B Vitter |
Insurance |
42 U.S.C. ยง 4001 National Flood Insurance Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - INTERIM PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 09/14/22.(my) |
Filing 4 HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/26/22.(cg) (Main Document 4 replaced on 8/31/2022 to correct Exhibit A) (my). |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Wright National Flood Insurance Company. (cg) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wright National Flood Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9516195) filed by Norris Cheramie, Jr, Andrea Falgout-Cheramie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Matthew B. Moreland added to party Norris Cheramie, Jr(pty:pla), Attorney Matthew B. Moreland added to party Andrea Falgout-Cheramie(pty:pla).(Moreland, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.