Karen Ofstad v. National Flood Insurance Program et al
| Karen Ofstad |
| National Flood Insurance Program, Deanne Criswell, Alejandro Mayorkas, Federal Emergency Management Agency and U.S. Department of Homeland Security |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv02984 |
| August 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Nannette Jolivette Brown |
| Donna Phillips Currault |
| Insurance |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4072 Payment of Flood Insurance Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - INTERIM PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 09/14/22.(my)
|
|
Filing 3
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/26/2022.(jls) (Main Document 3 replaced on 8/31/2022 to correct Exhibit A) (my).
|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against National Flood Insurance Program, Deanne Criswell, and Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9518607) filed by Karen Ofstad. Attorney Tony Nicholas Hernandez added to party Karen Ofstad(pty:selreq).(Hernandez, Tony) Modified text, parties, removed jury demand on 8/29/2022 (jls). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
