Smith v. Vannoy
Virgil Smith |
Darrel Vannoy |
Attorney General State of Louisiana |
2:2022cv03186 |
September 8, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Carl Barbier |
Janis van Meerveld |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER transferring petition to U.S. Court of Appeals - 5th Circuit to determine if petitioner is allowed to file successive habeas petition in this court. Signed by Judge Carl Barbier on 9/28/22.(cg) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 9/26/2022. (caa) |
Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Virgil Smith. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. (aj) |
Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Virgil Smith. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibits, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(aj) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 10/3/2022. (aj) |
Filing 1 ***DEFICENT*** PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Virgil Smith. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibits, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(aj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.