Leblanc et al v. Monsanto Company
| NOLAN LEBLANC and GAYE LEBLANC |
| Monsanto Company |
| FAYE GALJOUR |
| 2:2022cv03394 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Sarah S Vance |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Receipt of Transfer Case to the Northern District of California (my) |
Filing 5
Order of MDL Transfer to Northern District of California. MDL case number is 2741. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(mm)
|
| Filing 4 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 2741. (mm) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Monsanto Company. (cs) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (go) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Monsanto Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9565093) filed by Nolan Leblanc, Faye Galjour, Gaye Leblanc. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Jason Anthony Matt added to party Faye Galjour(pty:pla), Attorney Jason Anthony Matt added to party Gaye Leblanc(pty:pla), Attorney Jason Anthony Matt added to party Nolan Leblanc(pty:pla).(Matt, Jason) Modified text/filers on 9/23/2022 (cs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
