St. Charles Parish v. General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona
| Parish of St. Charles and St. Charles Parish |
| General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv03407 |
| September 21, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Barry W Ashe |
| Carl Barbier |
| Michael North |
| Other Statutes: Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 0205 - Enforcement of Foreign Arbital Awards |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Parish of St. Charles by General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Arbitration Clause, #2 Exhibit 2 - Policy)(Rew, Phillip)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (mb)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 29th Judicial District Court, case number 90901 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9565578) filed by General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Exhibit B - State Court Petitions, #3 Exhibit C - Arbitration Clause, #4 Exhibit D - Policy, #5 Exhibit E - City of Kenner Petition, #6 Exhibit F - Sworn Loss Statement, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Phillip J. Rew added to party General Security Indemnity Company of Arizona(pty:dft).(Rew, Phillip)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
