Norris et al v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
| Jennifer Norris and Douglas Norris |
| Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores Inc |
| 2:2022cv03489 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Jay C Zainey |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Wal-Mart Stores Inc, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.)(js) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (ess) |
| Filing fee paid from Douglas Norris, Jennifer Norris re #1 Complaint, (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9572964) (Dugan, James) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. (Prepayment of fee not required pursuant to 28 USC 1916) filed by Jennifer Norris, Douglas Norris. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Walmart, #3 Summons Walgreens)Attorney James R. Dugan, II added to party Douglas Norris(pty:pla), Attorney James R. Dugan, II added to party Jennifer Norris(pty:pla).(Dugan, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
