Gardner v. United Property and Casualty Insurance Company
| Matilda Ann Gardner and Matilda A. Gardner |
| United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv03507 |
| September 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(lag)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER: Considering Defendant United Property & Casualty Insurance Company's Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint (R. Doc. 8); IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant's deadline to file responsive pleadings is CONTINUED to December 5, 2022. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 10/25/22. (cg)
|
| Filing 9 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. identifying Corporate Parent United Insurance Holdings Corporation for United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (Scott, William) |
| Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney William B. Scott added to party United Property and Casualty Insurance Co.(pty:dft).(Scott, William) |
| Filing 7 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. filed by Matilda A. Gardner.(Poche, Dustin) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: On September 27, 2022, Plaintiff Matilda Gardner ("Plaintiff") filed a Complaint, asserting that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this case based upon 28 U.S.C. 1332, diversity jurisdiction. The Complaint, however, fails to adequately allege the citizenship of the parties. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff, Matilda Gardner, shall have seven (7) days from the date of this Order to file a comprehensive amended Complaint, without further leave of Court, properly setting forth the citizenship particulars of all of the parties as required to establish that the Court has diversity jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. 1332(a). Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 10/18/22.(cg)
|
|
Filing 5
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/26/2022.(js)
|
| Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the Summons. The pdf should not have the blue boxes nor the 3 red buttons at the bottom. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Clerk has taken corrective action. (js) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United Property and Casualty Insurance Company. (js) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against United Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9575179) filed by Matilda A. Gardner. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Dustin L. Poche added to party Matilda A. Gardner(pty:pla).(Poche, Dustin) (Attachment 2 replaced on 9/28/2022) (js). Modified text/filers on 9/28/2022 (js). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
