Williams v Underwriters at Lloyds London
| Nicholas Williams |
| Underwriters At Lloyds London |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv03624 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Greg Gerard Guidry |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(lag)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Underwriters At Lloyds London served on 10/6/2022, answer due 10/27/2022. (Muckleroy, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Underwriters At Lloyds London. (mm) |
|
Filing 3
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/26/2022.(mm)
|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Greg Gerard Guidry and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Underwriters At Lloyds London (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9585788) filed by Nicholas Williams. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) Attorney Joseph Azor Muckleroy added to party Nicholas Williams(pty:pla).(Muckleroy, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
