Gill v. Maritime Partners Services, LLC et al
| Jerome Gill |
| Maritime Partners Services, LLC, Centerline Logistics Corporation and Harley Marine Gulf, LLC |
| 2:2022cv03660 |
| October 5, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 0688 Marine Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Harley Marine Gulf, LLC. (ko) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Harley Marine Gulf, LLC filed by Jerome Gill.(ko) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to File First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Lance M Africk on 11/02/2022. (ko)
|
| Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Supplement and Amend #1 Complaint, by Jerome Gill. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading)(Robin, John) Modified text on 11/1/2022 (ko). |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc) |
| Filing 1 SEAMAN COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9588121) filed by Jerome Gill. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney John M. Robin added to party Jerome Gill(pty:pla). SERVICE VIA WAIVER.(Robin, John) Modified filer/text on 10/5/2022 (cs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
