Owens v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company et al
Krystal Owens |
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Personal Insurance Company |
2:2022cv03710 |
October 6, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Dana Douglas |
Jay C Zainey |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. Attachments have duplicate descriptions. For attachments, select either a category OR enter a description, but not both since this results in duplicate docket text. Clerk took corrective action. (js) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Personal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, #2 Summons Liberty Personal Insurance Company)(js) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (mb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9591126) filed by Krystal Owens. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney R. William Huye, III added to party Krystal Owens(pty:pla).(Huye, R.) Modified text on 10/7/2022 (js). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.