Southeastern Hospitality Partners, LLC v. Independent Specialty Insurance Company
| Southeastern Hospitality Partners, LLC d/b/a Comfort Suites and Southeastern Hospitality Partners, LLC doing business as Comfort Suites |
| Independent Specialty Insurance Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv03771 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Ivan LR Lemelle |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER AND REASONS granting #7 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff shall enroll new counsel no later than Monday, December 12, 2022. Failure to timely comply with this order may lead to sanctions without further notice; including dismissal of petition or defenses. Attorney Jeanne K. Demarest; Cassie Preston Gailmor; John Bartholomew Kelly, III; Jennifer Kuechmann; Kurt A. Offner; Roderick Alvendia and Cesar Roberto Burgos terminated. Signed by Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle on 11/28/2022. (mm)
|
|
Filing 8
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #7 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney. **1. Filing attorney should have selected 'Yes' at the question 'Is this an Exparte/Consent Motion Y/N?'. Exparte/Consent Motions are not set for submission. Clerk modified docket text to reflect 'Exparte' and removed submission date. 2. Filing attorney incorrectly changed 'N' to 'Y' at the question 'Is this motion to be decided by the Magistrate Judge Y/N?'. This motion will be decided by the District Judge. Clerk took corrective action. 3. Proposed Order should be added as a separate attachment to the motion and not as part of the motion. Clerk took corrective action. No further action is necessary.** (mm)
|
|
Filing 7
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Withdraw AKD Law Firm & Burgos Associates as Attorney by Southeastern Hospitality Partners, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Demarest, Jeanne) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/25/2022: #2 Proposed Order) (mm). Modified text/removed referral and submission date on 11/25/2022 (mm).
|
|
Filing 6
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(lag)
|
|
Filing 5
ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal,, by Independent Specialty Insurance Company.(Hamilton, Laci)
|
|
Filing 4
DIRECTIVE of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Independent Specialty Insurance Company. (cs)
|
|
Filing 3
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 08/26/2022.(cs)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Ivan L.R. Lemelle and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (go)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 24th Judicial District Court,Jefferson Parish, case number 832-109 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9594527) filed by Independent Specialty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Record, #2 Exhibit B - Secretary of State Service of Process, #3 Exhibit C - Secretary of State Documents, #4 Exhibit D - Louisiana Dept. of Insurance, #5 Exhibit E - Appraisal Estimate, #6 Exhibit F - Appraisal Letter, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Laci Nicole Hamilton added to party Independent Specialty Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Hamilton, Laci) Modified text on 10/11/2022 (cs).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
