Dang v. Safeport Insurance Company
| John D. Dang |
| Safeport Insurance Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv03871 |
| October 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl Barbier |
| Dana Douglas |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Safeport Insurance Company.Attorney Tara Elizabeth Clement added to party Safeport Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Clement, Tara) |
Filing 6
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(lag)
|
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Safeport Insurance Company served on 10/20/2022, answer due 11/10/2022. (Houghtaling, Brian) |
|
Filing 4
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/26/2022.(mmm)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Safeport Insurance Company. (mmm) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Safeport Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9603458) filed by John D. Dang. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Brian J. Houghtaling added to party John D. Dang(pty:pla).(Houghtaling, Brian) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
