Perrin v. Department of Homeland Security
Hon. Ur M. Jaddou, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Honorable Merrick B. Garland, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and Attorney General of the United States |
Brittney Perrin |
2:2022cv04204 |
October 26, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Carl Barbier |
Michael North |
Mandamus & Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to all Respondents by Brittney Perrin. (McLin, Jaesa) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Attorney General of the United States served on 11/1/2022, answer due 12/31/2022. (McLin, Jaesa) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Attorney General of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(cg) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (cc) |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9627976) filed by Brittney Perrin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Summons Garland, #4 Summons Jaddou, #5 Summons Mayorkas, #6 Summons USAEDLA)Attorney Jaesa Woods McLin added to party Brittney Perrin(pty:pet).(McLin, Jaesa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.