Best Bolt IPS of Louisiana Corp v. Underwriters at Lloyd's, London
| Best Bolt IPS of Louisiana d/b/a 2001 25th St., LLC and Best Bolt IPS of Louisiana Corp. doing business as 2001 25th St. LLC |
| Certain Underwriters LLoyd's London, Underwriters at Lloyd's, London and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv04207 |
| October 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Susie Morgan |
| Michael North |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, and Affirmative Defenses by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London.(Kelly, William) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint. Defendant, Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London, shall file responsive pleadings on or before 12/12022.Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 11/10/2022. (my)
|
| Filing 10 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer. ** Document should have been linked to another document by checking the box 'Should the document you are filing link to another document' or by selecting a related document on other appropriate screen. Clerk took corrective action by linking document 9 to document 1. No further action necessary.** (pp) |
| Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kelly, William) Modified link/text on 11/8/2022 (pp). |
| Filing 8 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London identifying Corporate Parent Ascot Bermuda Limited, Corporate Parent Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd., Corporate Parent Chubb Limited for Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London (Kelly, William) |
| Filing 7 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Best Bolt IPS of Louisiana Corp. (Offner, Kurt) |
|
Filing 6
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with exhibits. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(lag)
|
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER (No PDF Document Attached) Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 7.1, nongovernmental corporate parties must file a disclosure statement with their first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. IT IS ORDERED that any nongovernmental corporate parties in this matter file the required disclosure statement within seven (7) days of this order. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan.(bwn)
|
|
Filing 4
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS - CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 8/26/2022.(js)
|
| Filing 3 DIRECTIVE of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London.(js) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (mb) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 24th Judicial District Court, Jefferson Parish, case number 832-136, M (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9628279) filed by Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London. (Attachments: #1 State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney William M. Kelly added to party Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London(pty:dft).(Kelly, William) Modified text/filers on 10/27/2022 (js). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
