Meza v. Sanofi US Services, Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis US Inc. et al
| Francisca Meza |
| Sanofi US Services, Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis US Inc., Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. and Sanofi-Aventis U.S. Inc. |
| 2:2022cv04366 |
| November 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Michael North |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
PRETRIAL ORDERS. Signed by Judge Jane Triche Milazzo.(my)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services Inc. (am) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (mb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Francisca Meza re #1 Complaint, Notice of Designated Forum - Western District of Texas. (Paul, Richard) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Sanofi Aventis U.S. LLC, Sanofi US Services, Inc. f/k/a Sanofi-Aventis US Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9641595) filed by Francisca Meza. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)Attorney Richard M. Paul, III added to party Francisca Meza(pty:pla).(Paul, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
