Alarcon v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services
| Mario Alarcon |
| United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services |
| 2:2022cv04387 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Jay C Zainey |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1101 Immigration & Nationality Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services by Mario Alarcon. (Gahagan, Michael) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Summons to U.S. Attorney General, #2 Summons to U.S. Attorney's Office, Eastern District)(jls) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Injunctive and Mandamus Relief against United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9643644) filed by Mario Alarcon. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney Michael Wayne Gahagan added to party Mario Alarcon(pty:pla).(Gahagan, Michael) Modified text on 11/4/2022 (jls). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
