Miller v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Company
| Paula Miller |
| United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2022cv04869 |
| December 4, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl Barbier |
| Carl J Barbier |
| Dana Douglas |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 12/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 12/20/22 Order, #2 Case List)(lag)
|
|
Filing 4
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/22.(cg)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to United Property and Casualty Insurance Co. (cg) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl Barbier and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9682626) filed by Paula Miller. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Claude Favrot Reynaud, III added to party Paula Miller(pty:pla).(Reynaud, Claude) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
