Edenfield v. New Orleans City
| Anthony Edenfield and Anthony Edenfield, Sr. |
| New Orleans City |
| City of New Orleans |
| 2:2022cv05060 |
| December 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Dana Douglas |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to New Orleans City on 12/7/2022, answer due 2/6/2023. (Vasquez, Jessica) (Main Document 5 replaced on 1/6/2023) (cg).
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 12/22/2022. (Attachments: #1 12/20/22 Order, #2 Case List)(lag)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued as to New Orleans City. (js)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Dana Douglas. (cc)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT with jury demand against New Orleans City (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9688102) filed by Anthony Edenfield, Sr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons) Attorney Jessica Michelle Vasquez added to party Anthony Edenfield, Sr.(pty:pla).(Vasquez, Jessica) Modified text/filers on 12/8/2022 (js).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
