Nelson v. Louisiana State
| Michael Dewayne Nelson |
| Louisiana State |
| Attorney General State of Louisiana |
| 2:2023cv00375 |
| January 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Donna Phillips Currault |
| Greg Gerard Guidry |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the #6 motion is GRANTED and Respondent shall have an additional 30 days until April 14, 2023, to file a response in accordance with the court's briefing order (ECF No. 4). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner Michael Dewayne Nelson may file a written reply memorandum no later than 30 days after the filing of the Respondent's answer or opposition response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 3/14/2023. (cwa)
|
| Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT FIRST MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #4 Order Habeas Petition by Louisiana State. Motion(s) referred to Donna Phillips Currault. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Attorney Brett Sommer added to party Louisiana State(pty:dft).(Sommer, Brett) |
| Filing 5 Return of Service of H/C Response Order served on District Attorney on 2/17/2023, served on Clerk & Attorney General's Office on 2/16/2023 (Attachments: #1 Green Card - District Attorney, #2 Green Card - Attorney General's Office)(mm) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve, by certified mail, a copy of the application and this Order on the Attorney General for the State of Louisiana, and the District Attorney and the Clerk of Court for Tangipahoa Parish, Louisiana. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Attorney General or District Attorney file an answer to the application, together with a legal memorandum of authorities in support of the answer within thirty (30) days of entry of this order, as set forth in document. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days of entry of this order, the Tangipahoa Parish District Attorney shall file with the Court an electronic certified copy of the state court record to be uploaded into CM/ECF in a separate entry from the answer or memorandum. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner Michael DeWayne Nelson may file a reply memorandum within thirty (30) days after the filing of the answer or response by the Attorney General or District Attorney. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault on 2/13/2023. (cc: Attorney General of La, Tangipahoa DA, Tangipahoa Clerk) (cwa) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/13/2023: #1 Certified Mail Receipts) (cwa).
|
| Filing 3 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5-Receipt No.200000088) filed by Michael Dewayne Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aj) |
| Filing fee paid from Michael Dewayne Nelson re #3 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) (Filing fee $ 5-Receipt No. 200000088) (aj) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 2/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit) (aj) |
| Filing 1 ***DEFICIENT***PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254) filed by Michael Dewayne Nelson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(aj) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
