Plaisance v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Cindy Plaisance |
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech US, Inc. |
Cindy B Plaisance |
2:2023cv00456 |
February 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Donna Phillips Currault |
Jane Triche Milazzo |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Receipt of Transfer Case to Eastern District of New York (nml) |
Filing 5 Order of MDL Transfer to Eastern District of New York. MDL case number is 3044. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transmittal Letter)(sa) |
Filing 4 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 3044. (sa) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Exactech US, Inc., Exactech, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(sa) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (mb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9785052) filed by Cindy B Plaisance. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Exhibit, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney Philip C Hoffman added to party Cindy B Plaisance(pty:pet).(Hoffman, Philip) (Attachment 3-4 flattened & replaced image on 2/9/2023) Modified on 2/9/2023 (sa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.