Hines v. LeBlanc et al
Lonnie George Hines |
James M LeBlanc and Susan Hutson |
2:2023cv00585 |
February 14, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Carl J Barbier |
Michael North |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ORDER: Considering Plaintiff's application to proceed as a pauper (Rec. Doc. #2 ), accordingly, Plaintiff's application is denied because plaintiff has not submitted "a certified copy of the trust fund account (or institutional equivalent) for the prisoner for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint" as required by 28 U.S.C. 1915 (a)(2). Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 4/4/23.(cg) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint, #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 3/9/2023. (ss) |
Filing 2 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Lonnie George Hines. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (ss) |
Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Lonnie George Hines. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/16/2023: #2 Exhbits) (ss). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.