Montgomery v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
| Linnie Montgomery |
| Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Personal Insurance Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2023cv00613 |
| February 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Affirmative Defenses ANSWER to #1 Complaint, with Jury Demand by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.(Smith, Christopher) |
Filing 10
TEXT ORDER (No PDF Document Attached) granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint as to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company answer due 4/6/2023; Liberty Personal Insurance Company answer due 4/6/2023. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants shall have until April 6, 2023 to file any responsive pleadings in this matter. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 3/9/2023. (ctc)
|
| Filing 9 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #8 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint. **Document should have been linked to another document by checking the box 'Should the document you are filing link to another document' or by selecting a related document on other appropriate screen. Clerk took corrective action by linking document to document 1.** (mmv) |
| Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) Attorney Christopher William Smith added to party Liberty Mutual Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Smith, Christopher) Modified text/added linkage on 3/9/2023 (mmv). |
| Filing 7 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Liberty Personal Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Corporate Parent Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston, Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holdings Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Personal Insurance Company, Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc. for Liberty Personal Insurance Company (Smith, Christopher) Modified text on 3/9/2023 (mmv). |
| Filing 6 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company identifying Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Insurance, Corporate Parent LMHC Massachusetts Holding, Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Holding Company Inc., Corporate Parent Liberty Mutual Group Inc. for Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Smith, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed; Liberty Mutual Insurance Company served on 2/23/2023, answer due 3/16/2023. (Frey, Keith) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. (mmv) |
|
Filing 3
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/2022.(mmv)
|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9805664) filed by Linnie Montgomery. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Keith Martin Frey added to party Linnie Montgomery(pty:pla).(Frey, Keith) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
