Ingram v. Pacific Drilling Manpower, Inc. et al
| James M Ingram |
| Pacific Drilling Manpower, Inc., Pacific Drilling, Inc., Noble Drilling (U.S.), LLC and Noble Drilling U.S. LLC |
| 2:2023cv00991 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Jane Triche Milazzo |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Marine |
| 46 U.S.C. ยง 30104 Marine Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF NOBLE DRILLING (U.S.) LLC PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a) by James M Ingram. (Gulden, A.) Modified text on 5/3/2023 (am). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Noble Drilling (U.S.), LLC, Pacific Drilling Manpower, Inc., Pacific Drilling, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(sa) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jane Triche Milazzo and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 1 SEAMAN COMPLAINT against Noble Drilling (U.S.), LLC, Pacific Drilling Manpower, Inc., Pacific Drilling, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9856847) filed by James M Ingram. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)Attorney A. Spencer Gulden added to party James M Ingram(pty:pla).(Gulden, A.) Modified on 3/23/2023 (sa). (Attachment 2-4 flattened image & replaced on 3/23/2023) (sa). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
