Sancho et al v. McClenny, Mosely, & Associates, PLLC
| Charmel Sancho and Michael Sancho |
| McClenny, Mosely, & Associates, PLLC and McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC |
| 2:2023cv00994 |
| March 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Michael North |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC.(Waxley, Taylor) |
| Filing 12 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC (Waxley, Taylor) |
Filing 11
TEXT ORDER (No PDF Document Attached) GRANTING #9 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. McClenny, Moseley, and Associates, PLLC shall have an additional 15 days, or until May 20, 2023, to file responsive pleadings in this matter. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 5/5/23. (fmm)
|
| Filing 10 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer . **Document should have been linked to another document by checking the box 'Should the document you are filing link to another document' or by selecting a related document on other appropriate screen. Clerk took corrective action by linking document to document 1.** (mmv) |
| Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint by McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Waxley, Taylor) Modified text/added linkage on 5/4/2023 (mmv). |
|
Filing 8
TEXT ORDER (No PDF Document Attached) GRANTING #5 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Pursuant to LR 7.8, Defendant shall have an additional 21 days, or until May 5, 2023, to file responsive pleadings in this matter. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 4/14/23. (fmm)
|
| Filing 7 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #6 Stipulation. **DOCUMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ATTACHMENT TO REC. DOC. 5. CLERK HAS ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO REC. DOC. 5.** (mmv) |
| Filing 6 **DOCUMENT SHOULD HAVE BEEN ATTACHMENT TO REC. DOC. 5- CLERK HAS ATTACHED DOCUMENT TO REC. DOC. 5** STIPULATION by McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC re #5 First MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer to File Responsive Pleadings (Waxley, Taylor) Modified on 4/14/2023 (mmv). |
| Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer by McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC. Attorney Taylor Rene Delrie Waxley added to party McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC(pty:dft).(Waxley, Taylor) Modified text on 4/14/2023 (mmv). (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/14/2023: #1 Proposed Order) (mmv). |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; McClenny, Mosely, & Associates, PLLC served on 3/24/2023, answer due 4/14/2023. (Noland, Erik) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to McClenny, Mosely, & Associates, PLLC. (cg) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against McClenny, Mosely, & Associates, PLLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9856925) filed by Charmel Sancho, Michael Sancho. (Attachments: #1 cover sheet, #2 summons, #3 Request for Issuance, #4 Verification)Attorney Erik Noland added to party Charmel Sancho(pty:pla), Attorney Erik Noland added to party Michael Sancho(pty:pla).(Noland, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
