Erwin v. Murray et al
| David Erwin |
| Don Murray and Gregory Champagne |
| 2:2023cv01005 |
| March 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Michael North |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #3 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand , ANSWER to #1 Complaint, #3 Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by Gregory Champagne, Don Murray.Attorney Steven Michael Mauterer added to party Gregory Champagne(pty:dft), Attorney Steven Michael Mauterer added to party Don Murray(pty:dft).(Mauterer, Steven)
|
|
Filing 5
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Don Murray on 3/22/2023, answer due 5/22/2023. (Bizal, Gary)
|
|
Filing 4
WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to Gregory Champagne on 3/22/2023, answer due 5/22/2023. (Bizal, Gary)
|
|
Filing 3
First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by David Erwin.(Bizal, Gary)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (ess)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9858091) filed by David Erwin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Gary William Bizal added to party David Erwin(pty:pla).(Bizal, Gary) (Waiver of Service)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
