Tejada-Paz v. Garland et al
| Jennifer Tejada-Paz |
| Honorable Merrick B. Garland, Hon. Ur M. Jaddou, Hon Alejandro Mayorkas, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security and United States |
| 2:2023cv01044 |
| March 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Susie Morgan |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Mandamus & Other |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed; service date not provided. (McLin, Jaesa) Modified text on 4/12/2023 (pp). |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(pp) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (mb) |
| Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9863297) filed by Jennifer Tejada-Paz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Garland, #3 Summons Jaddou, #4 Summons Mayorkas, #5 Summons USAEDLA, #6 Exhibit A)Attorney Jaesa Woods McLin added to party Jennifer Tejada-Paz(pty:pla).(McLin, Jaesa) (Attachment 2 replaced on 3/27/2023) (pp). (Attachment 3 replaced on 3/27/2023) (pp). (Attachment 4 replaced on 3/27/2023) (pp). (Attachment 5 replaced on 3/27/2023) (pp). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
