Muhleisen v. Social Security Administration
| Kimberly Muhleisen |
| Social Security Administration |
| U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA |
| 2:2023cv01064 |
| March 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Donna Phillips Currault |
| Sarah S Vance |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Record of proceedings held before the Social Security Administration filed by Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA (Chickering, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 3
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Social Security Administration, U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA.Attorney Elizabeth A. Chickering added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft), Attorney Elizabeth A. Chickering added to party U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA(pty:ip).(Chickering, Elizabeth)
|
|
Filing 2
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (mb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9865147) filed by Kimberly Muhleisen. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Wiebke Breuer added to party Kimberly Muhleisen(pty:pla).(Breuer, Wiebke)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
