Hatcher v. Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc.
Marquise Hatcher |
Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc., Rusco Operating, LLC and D&S HSE Consulting LLC |
2:2023cv01090 |
March 29, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Karen Wells Roby |
Jay C Zainey |
P.I.: Other |
43 U.S.C. § 1331 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (Definitions) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ANSWER to #13 Amended Complaint by Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc..(Laggner, Gus) |
Filing 14 Summons Issued as to D&S HSE Consulting LLC, Rusco Operating, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mmm) |
Filing 13 1st AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc., Rusco Operating, LLC, D&S HSE Consulting LLC filed by Marquise Hatcher.(mmm) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 5/5/2023. (mmm) |
Filing 11 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Marquise Hatcher. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Pleading)(Kobetz, Natalie) |
Filing 10 DEFICIENT: EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to File First Amended Complaint by Marquise Hatcher. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kobetz, Natalie) Modified on 5/4/2023 (mmm). |
Filing 9 ORDER - Considering the Defendant, Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc.'s email correspondence that the parties have resolved the discovery issues related to the subpoena for documents that Plaintiff served upon Defendant, IT IS ORDERED that the Defendant's Motion to Quash Subpoena and to Set Aside Court Order (R. Doc. #8 ) is DENIED as MOOT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 5/2/23. (cg) |
Filing 8 MOTION to Quash Subpoena, MOTION to Set Aside re #5 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, by Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc.. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. Motion(s) will be submitted on 5/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Memorandum in Support, #3 Exhibit "A", #4 Notice of Submission)(Ishee, Michael) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer #1 Complaint, as to Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc. answer due 5/12/2023. Signed by Judge Jay C. Zainey on 04/18/2023. (cs) |
Filing 6 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Local Rule 7.8 Certificate)Attorney Gus Laggner added to party Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc.(pty:dft).(Laggner, Gus) |
Filing 5 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Serve Third-Party Subpoenas Prior to a Rule 26(f) Conference and the Plaintiff may serve subpoenas on Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc. and Danos, LLC prior to the occurrence of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 4/3/2023. (lb) |
Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION Leave to Serve Subpoenas by Marquise Hatcher. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Proposed Order)(Cvitanovic, Andrew) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc. (mmm) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Jay C. Zainey and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Woodside Energy (GOM), Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9869096) filed by Marquise Hatcher. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Andrew J. Cvitanovic added to party Marquise Hatcher(pty:pla).(Cvitanovic, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.