Doe v. The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
| John Doe |
| The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund doing business as Tulane University and Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund doing business as Tulane University |
| 2:2023cv01348 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Darrel James Papillion |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Wendy B Vitter |
| Civil Rights: Education |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to Judge Darrel James Papillion. Judge Wendy B Vitter no longer assigned to case. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 06/08/2023.(cs)
|
| Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed; waiver sent to The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund on 4/24/2023, answer due 6/23/2023. (Robertson, Alex) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the #7 , and #8 Motions are GRANTED. Andrew Miltenberg and Stuart Bernstein are permitted to appear as visiting attorneys for and on behalf of plaintiff, John Doe. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 4/26/2023. (Attachments: #1 Notice PHV Attorney) (mmv)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER AND REASONS: For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's #3 Ex Parte Motion to Proceed Under Pseudonym, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Motion is GRANTED to the extent that Plaintiff seeks to proceed by the pseudonym "John Doe," and Plaintiff shall be referred as "John Doe" in public filings, Plaintiff's name and identifying information shall be redacted from public filings, Tulane is prohibited from publicly identifying Plaintiff in connection with this litigation, the complainants in the underlying disciplinary proceedings shall be identified as "Sue Roe" and "Jane Doe" in public filings, and the names of Sue Roe and Jane Doe shall be redacted from public filings. The Motion is otherwise DENIED. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 4/26/2023. (mmv)
|
| Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Stuart Bernstein (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9909323) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit C - Consent to Electronic Filing, #4 Proposed Order)(Robertson, Alex) |
| Filing 7 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Andrew Miltenberg (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9909294) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Exhibit Declaration, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Exhibit Consent to Electronic Filing)(Robertson, Alex) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE to Visiting Attorneys Admitted Pro Hac Vice re 5 Text Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. (mmv) |
|
Filing 5
TEXT ORDER (No PDF Document Attached) GRANTING #4 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Kara Gorycki is permitted to appear as a visiting attorney for and on behalf of plaintiff, John Doe. Signed by Judge Wendy B Vitter on 4/25/23. (fmm)
|
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Kara Gorycki (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9907090) by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration, #2 Exhibit B - Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Exhibit C - Consent Form, #4 Proposed Order)(Robertson, Alex) |
| Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Proceed Under Pseudonym by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Declaration of Alex T. Robertson, #3 Exhibit 1, #4 Exhibit 2, #5 Exhibit 3, #6 Exhibit 4, #7 Proposed Order)(Robertson, Alex) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9906707) filed by John Doe. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Alex Tyler Robertson added to party John Doe(pty:pla).(Robertson, Alex) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Doe v. The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: John Doe | |
| Represented By: | Brian P. Marcelle |
| Represented By: | Alex Tyler Robertson |
| Represented By: | Jacques Charles Mestayer |
| Represented By: | Stuart Bernstein |
| Represented By: | Andrew T Miltenberg |
| Represented By: | Kara Gorycki |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund doing business as Tulane University | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund doing business as Tulane University | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
