Jones v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, et al
Rhea Jones |
Mead Johnson & Company, LLC and Mead Johnson Nutrition Company |
2:2023cv01610 |
May 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Janis van Meerveld |
Wendy B Vitter |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Receipt of Transfer Case to Northern District of Illinois (nml) |
Filing 5 Order of MDL Transfer to District of Northern Illinois. MDL case number is 3026. Electronic file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. (Attachments: #1 Transfer Letter)(cg) |
Filing 4 Notice of Conditional Transfer Order from MDL Panel regarding MDL 3026. (cg) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(mmv) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Wendy B Vitter and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (ess) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, Mead Johnson Nutrition Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9934761) filed by Rhea Jones. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons Mead Johnson & Company, #3 Summons Mead Johnson Nutrition Company)Attorney John C. Enochs added to party Rhea Jones(pty:pla).(Enochs, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.