Hughes v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
| Sharon Hughes |
| Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC, GEICO Indemnity Insurance Company, United Financial Casualty Company and Briana E Gordon |
| 2:2023cv01775 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Sarah S Vance |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
RESPONSE/MEMORANDUM in Opposition filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. re #7 MOTION to Remand . (Davidson, Jared)
|
|
Filing 15
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #14 Response/Reply. Filing attorney selected incorrect event. Correct event is ANSWER. Clerk took corrective action. (cs)
|
|
Filing 14
ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal with Jury demand by Briana E Gordon (Musgrave, Richard) Modified event/text on 7/12/2023 (cs).
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER Denying re #8 Request/Statement of Oral Argument filed by Sharon Hughes. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 06/23/2023.(cs)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Continue Submission date on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand. It is hereby reset for submission on July 26, 2023. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 06/23/2023. (cs)
|
|
Filing 11
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #9 Motion for extension to file. Filing attorney selected incorrect event. Correct event is Motion to Continue. Clerk took corrective action. (cs)
|
|
Filing 10
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #8 Request/Statement of Oral Argument, #7 MOTION to Remand . Attachment has duplicate description. For attachment, select either a category OR enter a description, but not both since this results in duplicate docket text. Clerk took corrective action. (cs)
|
|
Filing 9
EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Continue Submission date on Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (R. Doc. 7) by Uber Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Davidson, Jared) Modified event/text on 6/23/2023 (cs).
|
|
Filing 8
Request/Statement of Oral Argument by Sharon Hughes regarding #7 MOTION to Remand (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Earles, Derrick) Modified text on 6/23/2023 (cs).
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to Remand by Sharon Hughes. Motion(s) will be , #2 Proposed Order , #3 Notice of Submission )(Earles, Derrick) Modified text on 6/23/2023 (cs).
|
|
Filing 6
Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #5 Notice of Compliance. Filing attorney incorrectly linked document to document 4. Clerk properly linked document to document 1. (cs)
|
|
Filing 5
Notice of Compliance by Uber Technologies, Inc. re #1 Notice of Removal. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit State Court Pleadings)(Davidson, Jared) Modified link/text on 6/1/2023 (cs).
|
|
Filing 4
DIRECTIVE of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. (cs)
|
|
Filing 3
Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess)
|
|
Filing 2
Amended ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, by Uber Technologies, Inc..(Davidson, Jared)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court for the Parish of Orleans, case number 2023-4742 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9954633) filed by Uber Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Medical Records, #3 Exhibit C - Billing Record, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Jared A. Davidson added to party Uber Technologies, Inc.(pty:dft).(Davidson, Jared)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
