Smith v. Evonik Corporation
| Ashley Smith |
| Evonik Corporation |
| 2:2023cv01967 |
| June 8, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Carl J Barbier |
| Karen Wells Roby |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Order Vacating Case Referral to Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Carl J Barbier.(gec)
|
|
Filing 13
NOTICE OF 636(c) NON CONSENT ORDER: The undersigned Magistrate Judge has been notified that all parties have not consented to proceed to trial before a Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby on 7/13/2023.(lb)(NEF Sec J)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE REGARDING LOCAL CIVIL RULE 73.2: In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC 636(c), you are hereby notified that the assigned U.S. Magistrate Judge is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form Consent to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge is available on the Court's website. All signed consent forms or written notice of non-consent by any individual party should be emailed to the Magistrate Judge's chambers.(lb) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to John Mason Wymer for Evonik Corporation. Signed by Judge Carl J Barbier. (gec)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice as to Stanford Glenn Wilson for Evonik Corporation. Signed by Judge Carl J Barbier. (gec)
|
| Filing 9 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (John Mason Wymer) (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9998119) by Evonik Corporation. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Consent to Electronic Filing, #4 Proposed Order)(Babineaux, Joel) |
| Filing 8 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Stanford G. Wilson) (Filing fee $ 100 receipt number ALAEDC-9998106) by Evonik Corporation. Motion(s) referred to Karen Wells Roby. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Affidavit, #3 Exhibit Consent to Electronic Filing, #4 Proposed Order)(Babineaux, Joel) |
| Filing 7 Response/Reply by Evonik Corporation to #4 Order (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-2)(Babineaux, Joel) |
| Filing 6 *FILED IN ERROR-SEE REC.DOC. 7* Response/Reply by Evonik Corporation to #4 Order (Babineaux, Joel) Modified on 6/16/2023 (cg). |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal - Complaint (and Supplemental, Amending and Restated Petition) by Evonik Corporation.(Babineaux, Joel) Modified on 6/16/2023 (cg). |
| Filing 4 DIRECTIVES Pursuant to 28:1447(b) by Clerk.(cg) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl J Barbier and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (ess) |
| Filing 2 Statement of Corporate Disclosure by Evonik Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Evonik Operations GmbH, Corporate Parent Evonik Industries AG, Corporate Parent Evonik International Holding B.V. for Evonik Corporation (Babineaux, Joel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 40th JDC, St. John the Baptiste Parish, case number C-79632 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9974820) filed by Evonik Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-C, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Joel Paul Babineaux added to party Evonik Corporation(pty:dft).(Babineaux, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
