Ebraham v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
| AHMAD EBRAHAM |
| Allied Trust Insurance Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2023cv02052 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Sarah S Vance |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Notice of Removal, with Jury Demand by Allied Trust Insurance Company.(Scott, William) |
| Filing 4 DIRECTIVE of the Clerk regarding compliance with 28:1447(b) re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Allied Trust Insurance Company. (cs) |
Filing 3
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/2022.(cs)
|
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (cc) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL with jury demand from St. Tammany Parish, case number 2023-12202 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-9984581) filed by Allied Trust Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit- State Court Pleadings, #3 Exhibit, #4 State Court Pleadings)Attorney William B. Scott added to party Allied Trust Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Scott, William) Modified text on 6/15/2023 (cs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
