Saunders et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
| Melvin Saunders and Phyllis Saunders |
| State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and State Farm Fire & Casualty Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2023cv02755 |
| July 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Lance M Africk |
| Michael North |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS Second Amendment to CMO No. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 09/12/2023.(lag) |
Filing 4
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with Addendum. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/2022.(ko)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company. (ko) |
| Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (mb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10047076) filed by Melvin Saunders, Phyllis Saunders. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Dominique S. Badon added to party Melvin Saunders(pty:pla), Attorney Dominique S. Badon added to party Phyllis Saunders(pty:pla).(Badon, Dominique) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
