Vorhoff v. Social Security Administration
Jennifer Lynn Vorhoff |
Social Security Administration |
Kilolo Kijakazi |
U.S. Attorney Eastern District of Louisiana -SSA |
2:2023cv03134 |
August 4, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Lance M Africk |
Janis van Meerveld |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting #3 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall have until November 2, 2023, to file the certified administrative transcript, or to otherwise respond to Plaintiff's #1 Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 10/2/2023. (rt) |
Filing 3 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint, by Social Security Administration. Motion(s) referred to Janis van Meerveld. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Elizabeth A. Chickering added to party Social Security Administration(pty:dft).(Chickering, Elizabeth) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Lance M Africk and Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld. (kls) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Social Security Administration (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10066028) filed by Jennifer Lynn Vorhoff. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney Wiebke Breuer added to party Jennifer Lynn Vorhoff(pty:pla).(Breuer, Wiebke) Modified on 8/7/2023 (ko). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.