Holland v. USAA General Indemnity Company
| Romel Holland |
| USAA General Indemnity Company |
| Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
| 2:2023cv03164 |
| August 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Susie Morgan |
| Michael North |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Dismiss Case without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susie Morgan on 08/21/2023. (cs)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to USAA General Indemnity Company. (cs) |
|
Filing 5
HURRICANE IDA CLAIMS AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 1 with addendum. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 10/25/2022.(cs)
|
| Filing 4 EXPARTE/CONSENT First MOTION to Dismiss Case by Romel Holland. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Hurd, Aaron) |
| Filing 3 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Susie Morgan and Magistrate Judge Michael North. (mb) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Counsel by Aaron Hurd re #1 Complaint, . (Hurd, Aaron) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against USAA General Indemnity Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10067115) filed by Romel Holland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)Attorney Aaron Hurd added to party Romel Holland(pty:pla).(Hurd, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
