Dumas v. Mohawk Field Services, Inc.
Saleria Dumas and Saleria C Dumas |
Mohawk Field Services, Inc. |
2:2023cv03251 |
August 8, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Carl J Barbier |
Donna Phillips Currault |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 Job Discrimination (Race) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Correction of Docket Entry by Clerk re #1 Complaint. Filing attorney did not properly format the pdf of the civil cover sheet. When using a FORM, fill in the applicable fields then click the red PRINT button at the bottom to print the document to pdf format. Also, clerk changed the description 'Summons' to 'Waiver of the Service of Summons' to correctly reflect the document attached. Clerk has taken corrective action. No further action is needed. (gec) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Carl J Barbier and Magistrate Judge Donna Phillips Currault. (cc) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with jury demand against Mohawk Field Services, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10072080) filed by Saleria C Dumas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Waiver of the Service of Summons)Attorney Christopher Minias added to party Saleria Dumas(pty:pla).(Minias, Christopher) (Attachment 1 replaced on 8/9/2023) (gec). Modified on 8/9/2023 (gec). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.