Dillon v. E. Adrian Adams et al
| Errol Jeleel Dillon |
| Unidentified Parties, E. Adrian Adams and Zachary Grate |
| 2:2023cv03452 |
| August 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
| Eldon E Fallon |
| Janis van Meerveld |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff either pay the required filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis on or before October 10, 2023. If plaintiff fails to comply with this Order, the undersigned will recommend that this civil action be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Janis van Meerveld on 9/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Statement of Account) (rt)
|
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against E. Adrian Adams, Zachary Grate filed by Errol Jeleel Dillon. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Original Deficient Complaint, #3 Cover Letter, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss) Images QC'd on 10/2/2023 (aj). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 9/6/2023. (ss) |
| Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** COMPLAINT against Unidentified Parties filed by Errol Jeleel Dillon. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
