Gibson vs. Kenneth
Plaintiff: Clarence Otis Gibson
Defendant: Brandon Kenneth
Case Number: 2:2023cv05401
Filed: September 19, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
Presiding Judge: Michael North
Referring Judge: Sarah S Vance
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 OBJECTION to #7 Report and Recommendations filed by Clarence Otis Gibson. (ss)
November 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS #7 . Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Sarah S. Vance on 11/14/2023.(cs)
October 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #4 Complaint filed by Clarence Otis Gibson. For the foregoing reasons, it is recommended that Gibson's complaint requesting monetary relief against an immune defendant be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as legally frivolous and for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) and 1915A. Objections to R&R due by 11/13/2023. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 10/27/2023.(lb)(NEF Sec R)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 PAUPER ORDER Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis with a partial payment of $21.01 and directing the remainder of filing fee be made from Prisoner Account as to Clarence Otis Gibson in monthly payments as set out in document. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of summons until further order of the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael North on 10/11/23.(cg)(cc: Financial and Warden)
October 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Clarence Otis Gibson. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (Attachments: #1 Original Deficient Filing)(ss) Images QC'd on 10/24/2023 (aj).
October 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 COMPLAINT against Brandon Kenneth filed by Clarence Otis Gibson. (Attachments: #1 Original Deficient Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss) (Main Document 4 replaced on 10/13/2023) (ss). Images QC'd on 10/24/2023 (aj).
September 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT ProSe COMPLAINT: re #1 Complaint, Terminate Motions. Please see attached letter for steps needed to remedy deficiency. Deficiency remedy due by 10/12/2023. (ss)
September 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 **DEFICIENT** EXPARTE/CONSENT MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Clarence Otis Gibson. Motion(s) referred to Michael North. (ss)
September 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 **DEFICIENT** COMPLAINT against Brandon Kenneth filed by Clarence Otis Gibson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ss)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gibson vs. Kenneth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clarence Otis Gibson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brandon Kenneth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?