Augustus-Jones v. Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company
Donalisa Augustus-Jones |
Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company |
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator |
2:2023cv06551 |
October 27, 2023 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana |
Karen Wells Roby |
Sarah S Vance |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice of Compliance, List of Attorneys and Parties by Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company re #1 Notice of Removal. (cs) |
Filing 3 HURRICANE IDA CASES Third Amendment to CMO No. 1. Signed by Chief Judge Nannette Jolivette Brown on 09/14/2023.(cs) |
Filing 2 Initial Case Assignment to Judge Sarah S. Vance and Magistrate Judge Karen Wells Roby. (mb) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Civil District Court Orleans Parish, case number 2023-9517 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ALAEDC-10242682) filed by Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Certificate of Filing State Court Record, #4 Exhibit A-State Court Pleadings, #5 Certificate of Compliance, #6 List of Attorneys and Parties in State Court Action, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)Attorney James W. Hailey, III added to party Ocean Harbor Casualty Insurance Company(pty:dft).(Hailey, James) Modified text on 10/30/2023 (cs). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Louisiana Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.